Friday, May 28, 2010

Prasthaanam

Probably,this is the first time ever I am writing about a cinema,rather can be called , a review.One can just wonder what a made a guy, who just sits in a corner of a table in a cafe and calmly lend his ears to his close people continuously wondering how Scorsese made cinema,could write a review on a cinema?? "Prasthaanam" stimulated my desire to write.I was all goosebumps when Sai Kumar's voice went along in the background in the starting of the flick,saying,"Come,look beyond the epics,u would only see a man's desire to capture power that started all wars."Sai Kumar was the sole reason which drew my to the theatre but as the scene started unfolding,every character was justified and Mr.Katta was pretty clever in choosing actors for those characters.But,according to me,Kota Srinivas Rao might have suited well in place of Jeeva,but Jeeva's performance is decent,considerably.I just laughed at people who quoted that this movie has got Sai Kumar's life time performance,but I am wrong! Deva Katta has been successful in extracting the brillinace out of Sai Kumar.His voice added the grace to this cinema.
Coming to Sarvanand,even his performance has been decent.I believe,nobody could have done justice to that role better than this lad.His composure 's been asset!The new comer ,his name,i dont know has good emotions in him and he efficiently protrayed them on screen.
Country's contemporary politics laid this cinema.It succeeded in showing how money changes power and power changes people and it urges people to commit any crime.One of my mates said,Leader's script could have been written by any school going child,I agree,but not this cinema's.

I agree ,there was a unnecessary,irrelevant romantic track in this movie,but that is what,that makes front seat crowd to come to theatres.After all,to make the boat of the producer float,a director should keep an eye of his on box office also.I agree that presence of this irrelevant tracks made the cinema a bit less intense and a bit less jovial but one have to agree that this a daring attempt made by any telugu director to show cast hierarchy in contemporary Indian politics.I liked it ,after all.

21 comments:

  1. Yeah Sai Kumar was very good.His voice is haunting me even now.

    ReplyDelete
  2. and vikrant,i m expectin ur point of view,made eloborate,in you blog!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Shit i was not able to read it to the end. didn't feel like because deekshith, you belong to this species of people who create an unnecessary hype to a rather ordinary movie. Afternoon in tabandah i heard you call leaving las vegas a classic!!!! I highly doubt if you had ever saw that to the end. because, it's not something which a normal functional brian calls a " classic ".

    ReplyDelete
  4. @ sandeep :: may be,its my perspective on leaving las vegas.There is no compulsion in liking some cinema or disliking it ,i guess Sanddep! afetr all ,it has to struck my nerves in some way or the other!

    ReplyDelete
  5. And please man may lord be with you. stop talking about scorcese etc etc. they just don't sound good when you spell them.

    ReplyDelete
  6. probably,i may be an infant or tadpole infront of you ,regarding cinema...but I do have some taste and perspective to take,and its very disgusting to question the whole it!

    ReplyDelete
  7. I would have respected your taste and what was that. yeah something called perspective. if they were genuine and worthy. i am not calling you an infant nor am i a giant and most certainly this aint a walt disney picture mate where infants fight the giants. all i am trying to tell you is as a person who saw you closely and heard you clearly i am appealing to all those people not to beleive your words. and i am not accusing you of exagerration or something. but just that this ain't worthy.

    ReplyDelete
  8. will talk bout it when we two are alone togetha!

    ReplyDelete
  9. and sandeep,this is going off track,we r here to discuss only bout prasthanam but not bout our sides on different things!

    ReplyDelete
  10. I was talking about prasthanam. weren't you?.

    ReplyDelete
  11. dont be so smart,my dirty harry...both u and me know what were we talking about!

    ReplyDelete
  12. Come on, is that all? show me what you got. if you intend to stop this here then it would lead to a dangerous conclusion " Giant thrashes infant under his feet ". would you like that to happen. haven't you got any shit left??????

    ReplyDelete
  13. what do u want me to prove? i understood its all sarcasm,my dear sandeep! cut it out!

    ReplyDelete
  14. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  15. @ sandeep :: its pretty amusing that u couldnt digest the fact that a fool called deekshith didnt agree with ur opinion

    ReplyDelete
  16. And by the way what did dheeraj say? everyone's a fool deekshith. you, me, ashok, god and his wife. and yeah you were right i've got a digestion problem. what do you suggest? apar from gelusil.

    ReplyDelete
  17. that's what i'm talking about deekshith. honesty. i love this post of yours, after ages. i may not agree with your views but i like that sense of honesty in this post. i thought i'd never talk to you again but i guess we are still friends and i can't stand when some sonuvabitch(we know who i'm talking about) calls you whatever he has. and for god's sake, stop looking at yourself with such low esteem. infant, insect, fool..are you nuts?

    ReplyDelete
  18. gorrepati, you're so boring, predictable.

    ReplyDelete
  19. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  20. And yeah call me sandeep or even sandy would do. and yeah you're right i am boring. and also predictable. remember, never underestimate the predictability of stupidity..

    ReplyDelete
  21. i remember the line.."never underestimate the predictability of stupidity"

    ReplyDelete